PropFirmGrade home
Published Updated

Audacity Capital Review

Trusted review Written by Reviewed by Jovana Gjorgievska Fact-checked Andrej Gjorgievski

$119 one-off / $5K

Account size

Best code we found

Code auto-applies at checkout. Prices are re-checked against the firm's live pricing page.

C+ PFGGRADE Preliminary25 contract findings What the PFG Grade means One letter per firm, set by our own review of the published evidence, never by the firm. Weighting: payout reliability 25%, rule fairness 20%, trading conditions 20%, company trust 15%, challenge value 15%, support 5%. A B C D F NR C+ is preliminary: not yet backed by a completed purchase-to-payout evaluation. Firms cannot pay for a grade or buy placement. We update grades when the evidence changes.

Audacity Capital is not one challenge sold at different speeds. The three routes differ in what they take away.

  • Price · from $119 for a $5K account
  • Payouts · scheduled every 2 weeks, 80% split
  • Drawdown · $500 static at $5K
  • Not yet scored · No verified payout evidence yet
  • Not yet scored · Funded trader agreement not yet reviewed

Graded under methodology firm-grade-v1.2.0

Funded Trader Program (Instant Funding) · $5K

Steps to funded
Instant funding
Profit target
Not available
Daily loss
Not available
Max loss
10% · $500

Audacity Capital key facts

Checked against published terms on Oct 13, 2026

Company

Status
Active
Execution
Simulated
Vertical
Forex
Instruments
ForexIndices CFDCrypto CFDMetals CFDEnergy CFD
Platforms
MetaTrader 5DXtrade
Legal name
AudaCity Global LTD
Named principal
A. Karim Yousfi (Founder & CEO)
Headquarters
Mutsamudu, KM

Funding & payouts

Entry price
$49 one-off
Profit split
90%
Payout frequency
Every 2 weeks
Payout rails
Bank transfer, Crypto
Paid out through
Rise, PayPal
Payment methods
Card, Bank transfer, Crypto, Ewallet
Payments taken by
PayPal

Trading rules · Funded Trader Program (Instant Funding) · $5K

Drawdown type
Static
Minimum trading days
Not available
Consistency rule
Not available
Minimum payout
$20
Max position size
Not available
Last re-checked
Oct 13, 2026

Challenges and pricing

Challenge Account size Price Stages
Ability Challenge two step evaluation Reported $5,000 $49$42promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
$10,000 $79$68promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
$25,000 $195$168promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
$50,000 $329$283promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
$100,000 $549$472promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
$200,000 $1,049$902promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
Ability One one step evaluation Reported $5,000 $69$59promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
$10,000 $99$85promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
$25,000 $249$214promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
$50,000 $399$343promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
$100,000 $699$601promotional price Evaluation · Sim funded
Funded Trader Program (Instant Funding) instant funding Reported $5,000 $119$102promotional price Sim funded
$10,000 $279$240promotional price Sim funded
$25,000 $449$386promotional price Sim funded
$50,000 $1,299$1,117promotional price Sim funded

Prices are shown in the currency the firm charges. We never convert or blend currencies.

The short answer

Audacity Capital is a forex prop firm that lets you choose how you get to a funded account. The Ability Challenge is a two-step test for traders who prefer to take it slower, from $49 for a $5,000 account up to $200,000. Ability One is a single-phase test from $69, up to $100,000. The Funded Trader Program (FTP) skips the test, from $119 for $5,000 up to $50,000. All three trade on MetaTrader 5 or DXtrade.

The Ability Challenge gives you room: phase one allows a 15% maximum loss, fixed to the starting balance, and 7.5% a day, with no time limit, and you may hold trades overnight and over weekends. The split starts at 75% on both Ability programs and can reach 90%, and FTP pays up to 80%. Ability accounts pay every two weeks, the first payout 14 days after your first funded trade.

Two things to watch. The news rule is written two ways: the Knowledge Center blocks trading 3 minutes either side of major news, while the Funded Trader Program terms bar the events outright and want exposure cleared 30 minutes before. And the Terms prohibit negative reviews posted without what the firm calls a valid basis, at the risk of your account and legal action.

How it works

Each program sets its own path to a funded account. Here is how the three run, and the next section puts them side by side at one account size.

  • Ability Challenge (Two-Step): a 10% target in phase one and 5% in phase two, at least 4 trading days in each phase, and no time limit. The loss limits tighten after phase one and stay at 5% a day and 10% overall once funded.
  • Ability One (One-Step): one phase with a 10% target and at least 3 trading days, under a 3% daily and 6% maximum loss.
  • FTP (Instant Funding): no test. You start on the funded stage, can ask for a payout each time you reach 10% profit after at least 5 trading days, and the account doubles at each target.
  • Ability daily limits are fixed for the day at rollover, from the higher of your balance or equity. The maximum loss is fixed to the starting balance.
  • FTP’s daily floor sits at 95% of the day’s highest equity, and it never moves down until the reset at midnight server time.

Which Audacity Capital plan should you pick?

The three plans are compared below at $50,000, the largest size all three sell. Prices are list prices, before the discount code.

$50,000Ability Challenge (Two-Step)Ability One (One-Step)FTP (Instant Funding)
Price$329$399$1,299
Fee backWith your first payout, if it is larger than the feeWith your first payout, if it is larger than the feeNo
During the evaluation
Phases21None, funded from day one
Profit target10% ($5,000), then 5% ($2,500)10% ($5,000)None
Daily loss7.5% ($3,750), then 5% ($2,500)3% ($1,500)No evaluation
Maximum loss15% ($7,500), then 10% ($5,000)6% ($3,000)No evaluation
Minimum trading days4 per phase3No evaluation
Once funded
Daily loss5% ($2,500), set at rollover3% ($1,500), set at rollover5%, trailing the day’s highest equity
Maximum loss10% ($5,000), fixed6% ($3,000)10% ($5,000), fixed
Split75% to 90%75% to 90%60% to 80%
PayoutsEvery two weeks, the first 14 days after your first funded tradeEvery two weeks, the first 14 days after your first funded tradeAt each 10% of profit ($5,000), after 5 trading days

Same on all three: MetaTrader 5 or DXtrade at the same price, no time limit, and overnight and weekend holds allowed.

  • Pick the Ability Challenge if you want the most room and the lowest price. At $50,000 it costs $329, phase one lets you lose up to $7,500, and the fee comes back with a first payout that is larger than it.
  • Pick Ability One if you want a single phase and trade small enough to live inside 3% a day and 6% overall. It costs $399 at $50,000.
  • Pick FTP if you want to skip the test and will pay $1,299 at $50,000, nearly four times the Ability Challenge, with no fee back and a 60% to 80% split.

Our pick for most traders: the Ability Challenge (Two-Step). It is the cheapest of the three at every size they share, its first phase has the widest loss limits, and the fee comes back with your first payout if that payout is larger.

How much does Audacity Capital cost?

You pay once per account, with no monthly fee, by card, bank transfer, PayPal or crypto. List prices by size, before the discount code:

Account sizeAbility Challenge (Two-Step)Ability One (One-Step)FTP (Instant Funding)
$5,000$49$69$119
$10,000$79$99$279
$25,000$195$249$449
$50,000$329$399$1,299
$100,000$549$699Not sold
$200,000$1,049Not soldNot sold

The site advertises 14% off all three programs with the code 14th, and gives no end date. With it, a $5,000 Ability Challenge comes to $42 and a $200,000 one to $902. One table on the Funded Trader Program page gives the FTP entry fee as from $199, while the account picker and the checkout charge $119 for $5,000. Three more things about price:

  • The fee comes back only on the Ability programs, with your first payout, and only if that payout is larger than the fee. FTP fees are not refunded.
  • No activation fee on the Ability Challenge. The firm says the one-time challenge fee is the only cost. It does not say either way for Ability One, and for FTP says only “One payment, no recurring charges.”
  • FTP accounts are swap-free and commission-free.

Free trial

Audacity also runs a free trial that asks only for a name and email, with no card and no ID and no code: a demo of $5,000 to $200,000 on MetaTrader 5 or DXtrade. The trial page says it stays open while you keep trading and is removed after six months without a trade, while the Knowledge Center says a trial lasts 30 days from creation and you can open a new one straight away. It has no profit targets or drawdown rules, so it is practice on the platform rather than a rehearsal of the challenge, and it pays nothing and cannot qualify you for funding. Discount codes are for the paid challenges, and the trial does not count toward the grade.

Platforms and trading conditions

Audacity Capital offers MetaTrader 5 and DXtrade, and US residents can trade only on DXtrade. The platform you choose does not change the price.

  • Forex is traded as spot; indices and commodities as CFDs. The instrument list covers forex pairs, gold and silver, Brent and WTI oil, and indices. The Funded Trader Program terms allow majors and minor crosses but no exotic pairs, gold as XAUUSD, and the NAS100, DOW30, SP500 and GER30 indices. One Knowledge Center answer also lists cryptocurrencies, under its competition rules.
  • The firm’s pages disagree on position size. Its Trading Guidelines say you can open any lot size; its funded trader program page caps each position at 10 lots. Keep each position at 10 lots or under until the firm settles it.
  • Overnight and weekend holds are allowed on every program.
  • Expert advisors and copy trading are allowed, as long as you copy only from accounts you own.
  • VPNs are generally prohibited. A VPS is allowed for your own expert advisors.

The rules that matter

Start with the drawdown and the consistency rule, because those decide whether you pass. The news rule and the day-to-day rules follow.

How the drawdown works on a $100,000 Ability Challenge (Two-Step)

Both limits are fixed, not trailing. In phase one your equity, counting open trades, must never fall below $85,000, which is 15% under the starting balance. In phase two and once funded, the floor is $90,000, 10% under.

The daily limit is 7.5% in phase one and 5% after that. It is set once a day at rollover, from your balance or your equity, whichever is higher, and then stays put for the day. On day one that puts the floor at $92,500. Close a winning trade and the floor does not move until the next rollover. Hold a trade overnight that lifts equity to $104,000, and the next day’s limit is 7.5% of $104,000, so the floor rises to $96,200 even if that trade then gives back its gain.

Ability One is tighter: its test allows a 6% maximum loss, fixed to the starting balance, and 3% a day. On FTP the maximum loss is a fixed 10%, but the daily limit trails your highest equity during the day, as the table above shows.

Consistency: the Terms and the Knowledge Center disagree

The program pages and the Knowledge Center’s main answer say there is no consistency rule. The Terms say otherwise, and they are the document that can fail you:

The two documents disagree on consistency. The Knowledge Center says there is no consistency rule in place. The Terms carry a Consistency Clause, unnumbered and with no stated threshold, requiring consistency in trade length and lot size in order to pass the minimum trading days, and its worked example, one 15-lot position on one day against six 0.1-lot positions on six other days, fails the Ability Challenge. Separately, a Consistency Score below 70 can send an account to manual review, and below 50 you must keep trading.

The same Knowledge Center entry that sets out the score says it applies only to free competition accounts, then says the score is measured across every account type. Until the firm settles it, keep your lot sizes and trade lengths similar from day to day, and do not pass on one large day.

News: 3 minutes or none at all

News is the other rule the firm states two ways, and a trader following the Knowledge Center can still break the Terms.

The two documents disagree on news, and the stricter one is the contract. The Knowledge Center says you cannot open, close or add to a position, including a stop or target hit, 3 minutes either side of high-impact news, and that every FOMC event counts. The Funded Trader Program terms say something else entirely: “The trader is NOT allowed to trade major events including: NFP, interest rates decisions, Central banks speeches etc., all exposure must be cleared 30 minutes before the events.” Read literally, that bars the events rather than timing them, and clears the window ten times earlier. Trade to the 3-minute rule and you may still be outside the agreement you accepted.

Rules to know before you trade

Two more rules decide how you can trade day to day:

  • Keep every trade open for at least two minutes. The FAQ sets that minimum and says shorter trades may bring action from the Risk Team, and the prohibited practices treat entering and exiting within roughly two minutes as tick scalping. This matters most if you scalp.
  • Keep a funded account active. Clause 2.2 of the Terms ends a funded account after one consecutive month without trading. The Knowledge Center says six months, on all stages of all three programs. Neither says what counts as trading activity, so neither says whether a single 0.01-lot trade keeps the account open. Plan for the shorter period.

Getting paid: how does Audacity Capital pay out?

Ability accounts pay every two weeks, and you can ask for the first payout 14 days after your first trade on the funded account. On FTP a payout opens each time you reach 10% profit. The Instant Funding pages say the first one needs at least 5 trading days, while the firm-wide FAQ says 14 days after your first live trade. The smallest withdrawal is $20, the first one needs an identity check, and the Knowledge Center gives processing as up to 2 to 3 working days on one page and 3 to 5 business days on another. The split starts at 75% on both Ability programs and can reach 90%; FTP pays 50% to 80%. In full, by program:

ProgramSplitWhen you can withdraw
Ability Challenge (Two-Step)75% below 10% profit, 85% if you withdraw more than 10% profit within 30 days, up to 90% after two account doublings with consistent profit over 10%14 days after your first funded trade, then every two weeks
Ability One (One-Step)75%, then 85% at 10% profit or more, up to 90% through the scaling plan14 days after your first funded trade, then every two weeks
FTP (Instant Funding)50% to 80%, by account size, stage and time taken to reach the targetAt each 10% of profit, after 5 trading days and a 1 to 3 working day risk review with no trading

One comparison row on the Funded Trader Program page shows up to 90% on all three programs; the FTP table in the Knowledge Center stops at 80%. Also:

  • Payouts go by bank transfer (SWIFT or SEPA), PayPal, USDC on the Ethereum network or Rise.
  • A breached account gets no payout, even if it is in profit.
  • Scaling doubles Ability accounts after three months of 2.5% monthly profit and a withdrawal, and FTP accounts at each target, up to $2 million.

What FTP pays on a $5,000 account

You must make $500 before a payout. On stages 1 to 5, reach it in under 30 days and you keep 60%, or $300; take longer and you keep 50%, or $250. The account then doubles to $10,000 for the next stage. Later stages pay more for the same 10% target: 60% or 70% on stages 6 to 8, and 70% or 80% on stages 9 to 10.

What can end your account

These rules can end an Audacity Capital account. Each comes from its own Knowledge Center and Terms:

  • Letting equity, open trades included, fall below the daily or maximum loss floor.
  • Trading major news. The Knowledge Center puts the window at 3 minutes either side; on FTP, the Funded Trader Program terms prohibit the events outright and require exposure cleared 30 minutes ahead.
  • Tick scalping of 2 minutes or less, HFT, grid trading, martingale or adding to losing positions.
  • Third-party EAs, copying other traders or letting someone else trade the account.
  • Inactivity: the Terms say one month on a funded account; the Knowledge Center says six months.
  • Negative reviews without what the firm considers a valid basis.
  • Failing the Consistency Clause. The Terms say uneven trade length and lot size can fail the Ability Challenge, and the risk team may judge consistency on a trader’s style.

Who can join

Audacity Capital names five places where its services are not available, and adds two limits:

  • Restricted: the United States (except through DXtrade), Syria, Iran, North Korea and Venezuela, as the Knowledge Center lists them. The site footer puts it more loosely: services are not available where restricted, “including but not limited to Syria, Iran, and North Korea”, which leaves the list open.
  • Each program is capped at $200,000 of accounts per trader. An existing FTP trader may add an account as long as the combined size stays at or under $240,000.
  • You must be 18 or older.

What Audacity Capital’s agreement says

Five findings from the Terms, the firm’s policies and its site footer are worth reading before you buy: what you may say about the firm, what it may do with your orders, a claim about its review score, your bank’s chargeback route, and which company takes your payment. A note on where the split is written follows them. Where each finding stands with the firm is at the end of this section.

Negative reviews can end your participation

The Terms prohibit “reputational damaging language regarding AudaCity Capital … without a valid basis”, including “posting negative reviews or comments online”. A breach “may result in termination of your participation in the programs and may be subject to legal action.” The Terms do not say who decides what counts as a valid basis.

The clause reads in full:

“Using reputational damaging language regarding AudaCity Capital, whether internal or external, without a valid basis is strictly prohibited. This includes but is not limited to posting negative reviews or comments online. By participating in our programs, you understand that AudaCity Capital values its reputation and will take necessary action to protect it. You further acknowledge that any violations of this provision may result in termination of your participation in the programs and may be subject to legal action.”

Your order is Audacity’s property, and it does not have to fill it

On FTP, the firm also decides which of your orders count. Clause 2.4 of the Funded Trader Program terms says that under no circumstances is Audacity obliged to fill any order, and that it may reject, hold or execute any order at its sole discretion. The clause is quoted below, apart from its last sentence on contractor status. The same clause names your own trading performance as one input to that decision, and nothing in it requires Audacity to tell you which orders it held or rejected.

Clause 2.4 of the Funded Trader Program terms puts every order a trader sends into the firm’s ownership, and leaves the firm free to reject it, hold it or execute it on its own risk view. On a simulated account that is ordinary enough. What the clause does is say so with no exception, and with no obligation running the other way:

“Any order initiated by a trader is the exclusive property of Audacity. The firm retains complete discretion to manage such orders internally or to execute them, based on the company’s overall risk profile and the individual performance of the trader. Under no circumstances is Audacity obligated to fulfil or honour any order. The firm reserves the right to reject, hold, or execute any order at its sole discretion.”

The clause sits in the Funded Trader Program terms, so it covers FTP accounts, the stage the firm sells as funded trading.

The review policy claims a score that is not published

Audacity’s Fake Review Policy says the firm follows the review platform’s guidelines on fake reviews, and ends: “Our TrustScore reflects the genuine, aggregated experiences of our trading community.” When we checked on 1 September 2026, Trustpilot published no TrustScore for the firm, citing a breach of its guidelines, and said it had removed fake reviews. A reader of the policy page is told a score is genuine when there is no score to read.

Refunds and bank disputes

Both programs end the refund right once the account is purchased. Clause 3.2 of each set of terms says you are not entitled to a refund once the service has been started, that is, once the account has been purchased. The Funded Trader Program clause then adds that the fees are non-refundable once the trader has started trading on the account, so its cutoff is stated two ways. Both documents say you may not dispute the charge with your bank.

The bank-dispute sentence is the same in both, at clause 3.2 of the Ability Challenge terms and 3.3 of the Funded Trader Program terms. Chargeback rights come from card scheme rules and, in some places, consumer law, so whether a contract can remove them is for a court; what the sentence does is tell a buyer the route is closed:

“The customer is not entitled to open a dispute for the paid fee with the Customer’s bank or payment service provider as the completion of the purchase entitles the acceptance of the T&C.”

The company that takes your payment is named in a footer

The Terms say they govern services from AudaCity Global LTD in the Comoros. The Dubai company that handles payment, with its license number and address, appears in the site footer and not in the Terms. The footer reads:

“AudaCity International FZCO, registered under license DSO-FZCO 38282 at Dubai Silicon Oasis, DDP, Building A1/A2, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, acts solely as a payment facilitator.”

A Dubai Silicon Oasis free-zone license is a commercial registration. It is not financial regulation.

Where the split is written down

The split figures under Getting paid come from the Knowledge Center and the program pages, and the agreements do not repeat them. Clause 2.1 of the Ability Challenge terms says: “Unless expressly agreed otherwise, you will not be paid any remuneration or profits based on the results of your simulated trading, nor will you be required to pay any losses.” The Funded Trader Program terms say at clause 6.1 that the trader “receives a predetermined percentage of all profits that will depend on the stage of the account, the initial capital purchased and the time taken to reach the target”, and at 6.2 that the trader “is compensated on a profit split basis only”. Neither names a figure.

What Audacity Capital says

We sent the firm the three critical findings and the one material finding in this review, all drawn from Audacity Capital’s own documents. Audacity Capital can reply to us at any time.

Who you are dealing with

Audacity Capital’s Terms and footer name three companies, each with its own role, set out here as the firm’s documents give them.

DetailWhat Audacity Capital’s documents state
ProviderAudaCity Global LTD, registration 15850, Mutsamudu, Anjouan, Comoros
License shownInternational Brokerage and Clearing House license L15850/WL
UK office25 Cabot Square, London
Payment facilitatorAudaCity International FZCO, Dubai Silicon Oasis, DSO-FZCO 38282
Payment partnerPropmetry Limited, Limassol, Cyprus, HE469039
Chief executiveKarim Yousfi
  • The About page calls Audacity “a London-born proprietary trading firm” founded in March 2012.
  • The Terms say trading “is not real”, while the Knowledge Center says Live phase traders trade “with live funds in live markets”.

Trustpilot is not publishing a rating for this firm. Checked first-party on 1 September 2026, the profile carries two notices, quoted as they appeared:

“This company’s rating is unavailable due to a breach of our guidelines”

“We’ve removed a number of fake reviews for this company”

As of 1 September 2026, Trustpilot does not say what the breach was, so neither do we, and no aggregate rating is published. The profile still shows a star distribution, 60% at five stars, and that figure should not be read as a score: it is the arithmetic of a profile whose own platform has withheld the rating and says it removed fake reviews from it.

Why this grade

Audacity Capital’s weakest ground is rule fairness, where its Terms cut against its own guidance and a single risk breach costs you your profit; fixed loss limits and a reasonably priced route keep the rest steady. Neither payout reliability nor support counts yet.

Part and scoreThe reason
Rule fairness (20% of the grade)
36/100 · Weak
The Terms contradict the firm's own guidance on news trading and idle funded accounts, any risk-rule breach forfeits profit, and you can be removed with no reason and no refund.
Trading conditions (20% of the grade)
78/100 · Good
Every maximum loss is fixed to the starting balance and the typical target sits just above it, held back by a daily limit half the maximum loss and two platforms.
Company trust (15% of the grade)
75/100 · Good
The main deduction is a ban on negative reviews made without a valid basis, backed by removal and legal action; the fee-dispute and footer-company points are small.
Challenge value (15% of the grade)
74/100 · Good
A $200,000 Ability Challenge at $902 with the current discount code is the cheapest way in, $4.51 for each $1,000 of capital.
Payout reliability (25% of the grade)
Not scored
No Audacity Capital payout has been followed from purchase to withdrawal and no independent record has been checked, so payouts carry no score yet.
Support (5% of the grade)
Not scored
Audacity Capital's support has not been put to a test, and none has been run on any firm, so this stays unscored.
AI summary

Audacity Capital · what the record shows before you start

6 of 6

From the facts we hold for Audacity Capital: profit split 90% on Ability Challenge and Ability One, 80% on Funded Trader Program (Instant Funding); payouts every 2 weeks; entry from $49 (Ability Challenge, $5K account); we hold 15 rules on record for this firm. This summary is assembled from the canonical record, not from the firm's marketing.

Read the full summary

The current grade is C+ (preliminary) under methodology firm-grade-v1.2.0. Preliminary means the letter rests on what we have read so far and no payout has been tested yet, so it can move as verification completes.

Accurate?

Our verdict

Audacity Capital is a forex prop firm with three routes to funding, priced from $49, and its two-step test has the widest loss limits of its three plans. What it does less well: the split starts at 75% on the Ability programs, scalpers face a two-minute minimum hold, and its own documents disagree on news and consistency. It fits badly if you scalp, trade the news, or want to be free to post a negative review.

Best for

  • Traders who want room in the test. Phase one of the Ability Challenge allows a 15% maximum loss and 7.5% a day, with no time limit.
  • Swing traders who hold overnight and over weekends.
  • Traders who want to skip the test. FTP starts at $119 for a $5,000 account.
  • US traders who use DXtrade.

Avoid if

  • You close trades inside two minutes.
  • You trade major news or FOMC events. The firm’s own two rules on this do not agree.
  • You want to be free to review the firm honestly.
  • You want a high split from your first payout. Both Ability programs start at 75%, and the Ability Challenge pays 85% only on a withdrawal of more than 10% profit within 30 days.

Questions traders ask

Is the fee really refundable?

Only on Ability Challenge and Ability One, and only with your first payout, if that payout is larger than the fee. FTP fees are not refunded. Both sets of terms end the refund right once the account is purchased, and the Funded Trader Program terms also say the fees are non-refundable once you start trading. Both say you may not dispute the charge with your bank.

What profit split will I get?

It depends on the program. On the Ability Challenge you get 75% when your profit is below 10%, 85% if you withdraw more than 10% within 30 days, and up to 90% once the account has doubled twice and you consistently make over 10%. Ability One starts at 75%, moves to 85% at 10% profit or more, and can reach 90% through the scaling plan. FTP pays 50% to 80%, set by account size, stage and how quickly you reach the profit target. These figures come from the firm’s Knowledge Center and program pages; the agreements do not name a percentage.

When would I get paid?

On Ability accounts, 14 days after your first live trade and then every two weeks. On FTP, each time you reach 10% profit, after a review of 1 to 3 working days. The Instant Funding pages say the first payout needs at least 5 trading days, while the firm-wide FAQ says 14 days after your first live trade. Payouts go by bank transfer, PayPal, USDC or Rise, with a $20 minimum.

Am I eligible?

Audacity Capital does not serve residents of Syria, Iran, North Korea or Venezuela, and serves US residents only through DX Trade where permitted. The site footer says the restriction is not limited to the countries it names, and it names Syria, Iran and North Korea, so confirm with support before buying. You must be 18 or older.

Can US residents join?

Yes, but only on the DX Trade platform. The Knowledge Center lists the United States as restricted except via the DX Trade platform, and the site footer adds that US residents may only participate via DX Trade where permitted.

Which company am I dealing with?

The Terms name AudaCity Global LTD, registration 15850, with a registered office in Mutsamudu, Anjouan, Comoros, and a UK office at 25 Cabot Square, London. AudaCity International FZCO in Dubai acts as payment facilitator, and Propmetry Limited in Cyprus as a payment partner.

What if I stop trading for a while?

The two documents disagree. Clause 2.2 of the Terms ends a funded account after one consecutive month without trading, while the Knowledge Center says accounts are disabled after six months of inactivity. Neither document says what counts as trading activity, including whether a single 0.01-lot trade is enough. Plan for the shorter period.

Facts checked: 9 October 2026, against Audacity Capital’s Knowledge Center, Terms and site.

Sources

56 sources on record · 27 distinct pages
  1. Audacity Capital checkout, FTP (Instant Funding) Checkout configurator read re-checked 2 times since
  2. Audacity Capital checkout Official website read re-checked 3 times since
  3. Audacity Capital Funded Trader Program page and site footer Official website read re-checked 5 times since
  4. Getting Started With Trading Guide | Audacity Capital Knowledge Center Official website read re-checked 4 times since
  5. Audacity Capital Knowledge Center: General Official website read re-checked 3 times since
  6. Audacity Capital Knowledge Center: Trading Guidelines Official website read re-checked 3 times since
  7. Audacity Capital: Trading Assets page Official website read re-checked 2 times since
  8. Audacity Capital: instrument list page Official website read
Show 19 more sources
  1. Audacity Capital help: Ability challenge Official website read
  2. Audacity Capital help: Ability one Official website read
  3. Audacity Capital: Ability Challenge page, FAQ on costs Official website read re-checked 2 times since
  4. Audacity Capital: ftp Official website read
  5. Audacity Capital homepage: programme picker, Ability One and FTP tabs (rendered) Official website read re-checked 9 times since
  6. Audacity Capital Terms and Conditions Terms of service read re-checked 5 times since
  7. Audacity Capital Instant Funding page, FTP size and price ladder Official website read
  8. Audacity Capital checkout, Ability One Official website read
  9. Audacity Capital DXtrade trading platform page Official website read
  10. Audacity Capital MT5 trading platform page Official website read
  11. Prop Firm Free Trial | Practice With Up to $200K Demo Official website read
  12. Audacity Capital: Prohibited Trading Practices & Trading Restrictions Official website read
  13. AudaCity Capital Knowledge Center, six section pages Help center read
  14. Audacity Capital Reviews: Fake Reviews Policy & Commitment Official website read re-checked 2 times since
  15. AudaCity Capital – About page Official website read
  16. AudaCity Capital – author page, Meet Karim Yousfi Founder CEO Official website read
  17. Audacity Capital /trading-platforms, /trading-assets and the public trade.audacity.capital Official website read
  18. Audacity Capital Funded Trader Program Official website read
  19. Trustpilot profile for audacity.capital. Rating withheld under a guidelines-breach notice. Third party read

Every payout policy on record

3 published policies
  • Profit split
    90%
    Frequency
    Every 2 weeks
    Minimum payout
    $20
    Applies to
    Funded
  • Profit split
    90%
    Frequency
    Every 2 weeks
    Minimum payout
    $20
    Applies to
    Funded
  • Profit split
    80%
    Frequency
    Every 2 weeks
    Minimum payout
    $20
    Applies to
    Funded

Every rule on record

15 rules on record
Activation fee
Ability Challenge Funded $0

Ability Challenge: no activation fee; the firm says the only cost is the one-time challenge fee. Not stated for Ability One or FTP.

Inactivity
Ability Challenge, Ability One, Funded Trader Program Evaluation · Funded Varies

Inactivity closes the account: six months on the help centre, one month on a funded account in the Terms. The firm does not say what counts as activity.

Max daily loss
Ability Challenge Evaluation · Sim funded Varies

Daily loss is 7.5% in the first evaluation phase and 5% in verification and simulated funded stages.

Max overall loss 3
Ability Challenge Evaluation · Sim funded Varies

Maximum loss is 15% in the first evaluation phase and 10% in verification and simulated funded stages.

Ability One Evaluation 6%

Ability One uses 3% daily loss and 6% static maximum loss.

Funded Trader Program Sim funded 10%

Instant Funding uses a 5% daily trailing drawdown and 10% maximum drawdown.

Max position size
Ability Challenge, Ability One, Funded Trader Program Evaluation · Funded Varies

Each open position is capped at 10 standard lots (a limit the firm attributes to its provider); multiple positions are allowed and there is no overall lot cap. The firm's Trading Guidelines page now says any lot size can be opened, so its pages disagree.

Minimum trading days 2
Ability Challenge Evaluation Varies

Ability Challenge: minimum of 4 trading days.

Ability One Evaluation Varies

Ability One: minimum of 3 trading days.

Payout buffer
Funded Trader Program Sim funded Varies

FTP payout eligibility is tied to a 10% profit mark and at least five trading days; the published split ranges from 50% to 80%.

Profit target 2
Ability Challenge Evaluation Varies

Two-step evaluation targets are 10% then 5%.

Ability One Evaluation 10%

Single evaluation phase with a 10% target.

Prohibited practices
Ability Challenge, Ability One, Funded Trader Program Evaluation · Sim funded Varies

The program page permits news and weekend trading, EAs, and copy trading from accounts owned by the same trader; the full prohibited-strategy list remains separate.

Time limit 2
Ability Challenge, Ability One, Funded Trader Program Evaluation · Sim funded Varies

Ability Challenge, Ability One, Funded Trader Program (Instant Funding): the firm states no time limit.

Funded Trader Program Sim funded Varies

Funded Trader Program (Instant Funding): the firm states no time limit.

Every country restriction on record

Audacity Capital does not open funded accounts for residents of at least these 5 jurisdictions, per the firm's own terms. This is not the whole list: the firm publishes further restrictions for some of its products that our record does not yet hold, so a country missing here is not a country that is allowed.

Partial list · check the firm's terms for the product you intend to buy.

Signup prohibited 4

  • Iran
  • North Korea
  • Syria
  • Venezuela

Platform restricted 1

  • United States (except via DX Trade platform)

Check your own eligibility in the firm's signup flow before you buy. Lists change without notice.

Contract findings

  1. Ability Challenge GTC 2.2 and Funded Trader Program GTC 2.2; the same sentence also appears unnumbered at the end of the General Terms and Conditions section · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The sentence appears three times in the Terms, so it is not a drafting slip, and it terminates a funded account after one consecutive month without trading. The firm's own knowledge base, captured the same day, states a different period: "Ability accounts (all stages), Ability One and the Funded Trader Program(Instant Funding) follow a six-month inactivity rule. If there is no trading activity within this period, the account will be permanently disabled and breached." A trader who takes a two-month break is compliant under the published rule and terminated under the binding one. Neither document says the other is superseded, and the Terms carry no date against which to judge which is later. Note also that clause 2.2 speaks of a "funded account" inside the Ability Challenge GTC, which is the demo agreement, so the clause's reach is unclear even within its own document.

  2. Funded Trader Program GTC, 2.4 Ownership and Discretion over Orders · Terms of Service & Conditions

    This is in the Funded Trader Program GTC, the agreement governing the stage the firm sells as live trading. It states that the firm is never obliged to fulfil or honour any order, and may reject, hold or execute at its sole discretion, with the trader's own performance named as one of the inputs to that decision. The trader's results are therefore not a function of their trading alone; they are a function of which of their orders the firm chose to honour, decided partly on how they had been performing. "Hold" is the sharpest of the three verbs, because an order held rather than rejected leaves the trader believing they have a position. Nothing in the clause requires the trader to be told which happened. Recorded because it bears directly on whether a funded result is the trader's own, which is the premise the programme is sold on.

  3. Funded Trader Program GTC, 5. Risk Management Rules (fourth bullet in the unnumbered list) · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The Terms prohibit trading major events outright and require all exposure to be cleared 30 minutes before them. The firm's own knowledge base, captured the same day, says the opposite: "You may hold trades over the weekend and trade during news events. Simply avoid opening, closing(TP, SL or manual) or adding to positions within 3 minutes before or after any high impact news release or speech", and states that this "applies to all programs (Ability Challenge, Ability One, FTP(instant funding)". Two conflicts sit inside that, not one. The Terms forbid the activity that the FAQ permits, and where the FAQ allows a position to be open up to 3 minutes before a release the Terms require it closed 30 minutes before, a window ten times longer. The Terms also leave the event list open with "etc.", so the prohibited set is not knowable in advance from the binding document. Our own rules.json currently records the permissive version, under audacity-shared-trading-permissions, because it was read from the program page.

  4. Funded Trader Program GTC, 6. Profit Sharing, 6.3 and 6.4 · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    Two limbs. 6.3 removes payout entitlement for any profit "made without respecting risk rules", with no materiality threshold and no distinction between a breach that produced the profit and one that did not. The sentence is also garbled in the firm's own text, reading "Audacity is not entitled to a payout" where the party losing the entitlement is plainly the trader, so the operative sentence of the forfeiture clause does not name the right party. 6.4 is broader again: it forfeits profits for "any illegal, malicious, manipulative, or toxic trading activities", and "toxic" is not defined anywhere in the document. Read with section 5, which states risk rules that conflict with the firm's own published FAQ on news trading, a trader can breach a rule they were told they could follow and lose the profit for it.

  5. Irresponsible Trading (unnumbered heading; the section ends with a stray clause number 9.2). The identical section appears twice, once in the Ability Challenge GTC and once in the Funded… · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The clause is a reserved right to remove any trader from any program at any time, for no stated reason, with the fee expressly retained. It is not a for-cause termination provision: the words "without giving any explanation" remove the only thing that would let a trader test whether a ground existed. The sentences around it do describe cause (illegal activity, arbitrage, gambling behavior), which makes the at-will sentence read as an additional and unlimited power rather than a summary of the ones before it. The firm also disclaims liability for anything that follows from exercising it. Because the same section is reproduced in both GTCs, it reaches the paid evaluation and the funded stage alike. What it does not say is what happens to profit already credited when the withdrawal happens; the forfeiture clause at 6.3 and 6.4 covers rule breaches, and this clause needs no breach at all.

  6. Termination · Terms of Service & Conditions

    The clause names posting negative reviews online as prohibited conduct and attaches two consequences: termination from the programs, and possible legal action. It is qualified by "without a valid basis", which is the only thing separating it from a flat ban on criticism, and the Terms do not say who decides whether a basis is valid. On the plain reading that is the firm, since it is the firm that terminates and the firm that sues. The practical effect on a trader deciding whether to post is the same either way: they cannot know in advance whether their complaint will be judged to have a valid basis, and the downside of guessing wrong is their account and a legal threat. Recorded at critical rather than material because of the legal-action limb, which no other anti-disparagement clause on the roster carries, and because it sits directly alongside a critical finding already open against this firm about its published TrustScore. A clause that deters negative reviews and a claim resting on aggregated review scores bear on each other.

  7. Trustpilot Statement · Fake Review Policy

    The firm publishes a dedicated Fake Review Policy page asserting, in the present tense, that it strictly adheres to Trustpilot's guidelines and that its TrustScore reflects genuine aggregated experience. Checked on 2026-08-27: Trustpilot publishes NO TrustScore for audacity.capital. The rating is withheld under a breach-of-guidelines notice, and Trustpilot states it has removed fake reviews for this company. There is no score for the sentence to be true of. This is a first-party claim contradicted by the very platform it names, and the contradiction is checkable by anyone in one page load. The page also lists what the firm does NOT do – purchase reviews, offer compensation for positive reviews, mandate reviews as a condition of payouts – which makes the omission of the withheld rating conspicuous rather than incidental.

  8. *Consistency Clause (unnumbered heading, marked with an asterisk) · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The clause states no threshold. It gives one worked example, of 15 lots on one day against 0.1 lots on six others, and then reserves an open-ended discretion to assess consistency on "the trader's style, including but not limited to lot size and trade duration". A trader cannot compute in advance whether their trading passes, because the test is whatever the risk team decides it is, and the stated consequence is failing the Ability Challenge, which is the paid product. The knowledge base carries its own consistency material, including a rule it labels as applying to competition accounts only, so the two documents do not describe one settled test.

  9. Ability Challenge GTC, 3. Fees, 3.2 · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The firm markets the Ability Challenge registration fee as refundable, and its knowledge base says the refund is "processed along with your first payout from trading on a live account" and that "Once a trader starts trading on their account, the fees become non-refundable." The contract says something different and harsher. The disqualifying condition is written with "and/or", so purchase alone ("the service has been started (i.e. the account has been purchased)") removes the entitlement on the plain reading, before any trading has taken place. The Funded Trader Program GTC 3.2 is unambiguous in the same direction, ending "ALL PAYMENTS ARE FINAL." Nothing in either GTC creates the refundable-fee benefit the firm advertises, so the marketed refund rests on FAQ text rather than on the agreement.

  10. Fake Reviews Policy FAQs, "What happened to Audacity Capital's Trustpilot profile?" · Audacity Capital Reviews: Fake Reviews Policy & Commitment

    This is new since the 2026-08-27 reading and it changes the shape of the critical finding already open against this firm. The same page now does both things at once. Under "Trustpilot Statement" it still says, in the present tense, "We actively monitor our profile" and "Our TrustScore reflects the genuine, aggregated experiences of our trading community". Further down its own FAQ says the profile "became unavailable". A TrustScore that reflects aggregated experience and a profile that is unavailable cannot both be current. The FAQ answer is also written in the passive throughout, attributing the outcome to "third-party impersonation and platform-related actions" and stating only that the firm "has never knowingly published fake reviews", which is a narrower assertion than the zero-tolerance framing at the top of the same page. Recorded separately from the existing finding because that one records a claim contradicted by Trustpilot; this one records a claim contradicted by the firm, on the same page, and it is checkable without leaving the document.

  11. Fees, 3.2 (Ability Challenge GTC) and 3.3 (Funded Trader Program GTC) · Terms of Service & Conditions

    The same sentence appears in both of the GTCs on this page, so it covers the Ability Challenge and the Funded Trader Program alike. It purports to remove the buyer's right to raise a dispute with their own bank or payment provider. That is not a right the seller grants, so it is not obviously the seller's to take away: chargeback rights come from the card scheme rules and, in several jurisdictions, from consumer protection law that a contract term cannot displace. Whether the clause is enforceable is a question for a court, and this finding does not assert that it is not. What is recorded is what it does to the buyer's behaviour, which does not depend on enforceability: a buyer who reads it will believe the route is closed, and the route is the main practical remedy available to someone who has paid a fee and believes the service was not delivered. It sits beside "ALL PAYMENTS ARE FINAL" and a no-refund-once-started rule in the same section.

  12. Funded Trader Program GTC, 2.1 Funded trader account · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The Funded Trader Program GTC describes trading in a live environment on MT5. The site footer captured the same day describes the whole operation the other way: "Since 2012, AudaCity Capital has been committed to developing trading talent through structured evaluation and education within a professional-grade simulated trading infrastructure focused on skill-building, not speculation." The Ability Challenge GTC at 2.1 agrees with the footer and not with the funded GTC, stating that trading "is not real" and the funds "are fictitious". Whether a funded Audacity trader's orders reach a market is therefore answered three different ways across two documents, and clause 2.4 of the same funded GTC says the firm is never obliged to honour an order in any case. The clause is also the firm's own statement that it is not FCA authorized, which sits against marketing that leads with a London trading floor and a UK office address.

  13. Funded Trader Program GTC, 4. Employment Status, 4.4 and 4.5 · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    Two reclassifications in consecutive clauses. 4.4 deems the trader a professional rather than a retail trader, and does so by assumption ("assuming you're having a high level of knowledge, expertise and experience") rather than by any assessment or election the trader makes. 4.5 states the trader is not a client at all, and the same denial is repeated at 2.4: "It is to be expressly understood that our traders operate as contractor team members under a self-employed contract and are not considered clients of Audacity." The retail and client categories are the ones that carry consumer and conduct protections in most of the jurisdictions the firm markets into, and the document elects the trader out of both without asking. It sits beside 4.2 and 4.3, which put every tax liability on the trader and require them to indemnify the firm for it.

  14. Funded Trader Program GTC, 6. Profit Sharing, 6.1 and 6.2 · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The contract fixes no percentage. It says the share is "predetermined" but makes it depend on three variables, including "the time taken to reach the target", and names no figure for any combination of them. The firm advertises up to 90 percent, and its knowledge base publishes a grid running from 50 to 80 percent on the Funded Trader Program according to whether the target was reached inside or outside 30 days. None of that grid is in the contract the buyer accepts. 6.2 adds a gate rather than a rate: the trader is paid "once (and only when)" a ten percent target is hit, so a trader who makes eight percent and stops is paid nothing at all. In the Ability Challenge GTC the position is starker still, because clause 2.1 of that agreement states that "Unless expressly agreed otherwise, you will not be paid any remuneration or profits based on the results of your simulated trading".

  15. General Terms and Conditions (unnumbered), and repeated in both GTCs at clause 1.3 · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    Amendment is unilateral, immediate and unannounced, and acceptance is deemed from continued use. Both GTCs repeat the mechanism and place the burden on the customer: "It is your responsibility to check this page AND the website periodically for changes." Because the document carries no version number and no effective date, a trader has no way to tell whether the page in front of them differs from the one they accepted; there is nothing to compare. The same section also carries substantive trading terms, including the one-month inactivity rule, so this is not confined to website housekeeping.

  16. Tick Scalping, Edge case · Prohibited Trading Practices & Trading Restrictions | Audacity Capital

    The Prohibited Trading Practices page is one of the four documents listed at checkout. Under Tick Scalping it says a single trade that closes quickly because its stop-loss or take-profit was hit by an unexpected news spike "is a violation". The same sentence then says the issue is a pattern of trading style, and the High-Frequency Trading section on the same page says an isolated fast exit caused by news is "not automatically HFT". Read as written, one trade the trader did not choose to close fast can be treated as prohibited scalping. The trader cannot control when a news spike reaches a resting stop, so the rule reaches an outcome, not a choice. The page states no consequence of its own; clauses 6.3 and 6.4 of the Funded Trader Program GTC forfeit profit for violations of the risk rules and for "toxic" trading.

  17. Funded Trader Program GTC, 4. Employment Status, 4.3, read with 6.4 · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The indemnity is uncapped and runs one way. It covers any tax, VAT or National Insurance assessment arising from the trader's performance, and extends to the firm's legal and accounting costs on an indemnity basis, which is the costs standard that recovers substantially all of them. A second indemnity sits at 6.4, where the trader agrees to "indemnify and hold harmless AudaCity Capital from any losses or damages" resulting from arbitrage or activities the clause calls malicious, manipulative or toxic, none of which are defined. There is no reciprocal indemnity and no liability cap anywhere in the document, so the trader's exposure under these two clauses is open-ended while the firm's is disclaimed.

  18. Funded Trader Program GTC, 5. Risk Management Rules (final bullet) · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The contract confines funded trading to major and minor currency crosses, gold as XAUUSD and four named indices, and prohibits exotics outright. That is a closed list, and it is materially narrower than the instrument coverage the site presents, which includes a read-only spreads account the knowledge base offers so that a buyer can "explore the spreads for all available instruments". Our own rules.json holds no instrument restriction for this firm, so this is a contract-only term that a buyer comparing firms on tradable markets would not find. The list also does not name cryptocurrencies, commodities other than gold, or single stocks either to permit or to prohibit them.

  19. Retention and Use of Historical Account Data (unnumbered heading) · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The clause keeps data from closed, breached and terminated accounts with no stated retention period, and expressly reuses it to assess "your eligibility for future participation in our services, products, programs, or promotions". It amounts to a permanent record that can bar a returning customer, with no stated route to see it, correct it or contest a decision made from it. It sits against the same page's earlier statement that data "is retained only for as long as necessary" and against the Right to be Forgotten section, neither of which mentions this carve-out, and the Right to be Forgotten section states that erasing the data ends the business relationship.

  20. Site footer · Fake Review Policy footer

    The contracting entity, its licence number and its address appear in a site footer rather than in the Terms. It is a Dubai Silicon Oasis free-zone company at DDP Building A1/A2 – the same building complex as Aqua Funded FZCO, which is registered at Building A2 of the same address. That is a shared free-zone office park rather than evidence of a relationship between the two firms, and it is recorded so nobody later mistakes the coincidence for one. A DSO free-zone licence is a commercial registration and is not financial-services regulation.

  21. What We Consider Fake · Audacity Capital Reviews: Fake Reviews Policy & Commitment

    Three of the four definitions turn on the author or the method: no account, a bot or agency, or coordination. Only the fourth turns on falsity. The third, "Coordinated attacks aimed at artificially deflating our rating", is defined by its effect on the firm's rating rather than by whether anything said was untrue, so a set of genuine negative reviews arriving together is inside the definition on its face. The enforcement attached to the policy is removal rather than reply: "Issuing formal DMCA takedown requests", "Filing trademark complaints with social media platforms and domain registrars" and "Collaborating with hosting providers and search engines to de-index and remove fraudulent content". No money is at stake in this document and it imposes no obligation on a trader, which is why it is filed below the Terms clause that does. Its significance is that it reaches content on platforms the firm does not own, and that it names the firm as the judge of which reviews qualify.

  22. Whole document; opening paragraph quoted · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    The Terms of Service & Conditions page carries no effective date, no last-updated date and no version number anywhere in the document read on 2026-09-15. The opening paragraph dates it by implication instead, describing the General Data Protection Regulation as "new"; GDPR came into force in May 2018. Other internal signals point the same way: the Irresponsible Trading section ends on a clause number 9.2 in a document whose surrounding clauses stop at 6, the Ability Challenge GTC numbers its fees clauses 3.1 to 3.4 while the Funded Trader Program GTC skips from 3.4 to 3.6, and the page carries two different Data Protection Officer contact addresses, support@audacity.capital in one How to exercise your Rights section and info@audacitycapital.co.uk in the other. The page also still calls the funded route a program under the co.uk brand while the footer names a Dubai FZCO and a Comoros entity. This is a finding in its own right because the document is the one the buyer accepts and there is nothing in it to tell them which version they accepted or when it was written.

  23. Whole document. Read in full on 2026-09-15: Introduction, Internal record keeping, Your rights and choices relating to your personal data, General Terms and Conditions, Disclaimer, General… · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    Read in full, the Terms of Service & Conditions page captured on 2026-09-15 contains no governing-law clause, no jurisdiction or venue clause, no arbitration agreement, no class-action waiver, no jury waiver, no limitation period for bringing a claim and no complaints or internal-dispute procedure. The only liability language is the website disclaimer in the General Terms and Conditions section and the modification disclaimer in General Conditions and Modifications; neither is a cap on the firm's liability under the trading programs. The absence is scoped to that document. It cuts both ways and is recorded at notable rather than material for that reason: nothing forces a trader into a distant forum or strips a remedy, but a trader with a dispute is also given no forum, no procedure and no stated law, while the contracting entity named in the GTCs is registered in Anjouan, Union of Comoros. The contract does name the one route it closes, at 3.3, which is a dispute with the buyer's own bank.

  24. Funded Trader Program GTC, 5. Risk Management Rules (fourth and fifth bullets) · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    Favorable to the trader, and filed informational so that it cannot be scored against the firm. Both drawdown bullets end with the same express statement that the trader is not liable to losses, which puts beyond doubt on the funded side what clause 2.1 of the Ability Challenge GTC says on the demo side. It is worth recording because the same document reclassifies the trader as a self-employed contractor rather than a client, and a reader who reached clause 4 first might reasonably fear that trading losses followed them; these two bullets say they do not.

  25. Funded Trader Program GTC, 5. Risk Management Rules (second bullet) · Terms of Service & Conditions | Audacity Capital

    Favorable to the trader, and filed informational so that it cannot be scored against the firm. Holding over a session close and over a weekend is permitted in the binding document and not only in marketing, which is the opposite of the pattern on the news-trading bullet three lines below it, where the contract is stricter than the published guidance. The knowledge base agrees on this point and adds that Funded Trader Program accounts are swap-free, so the permission is not undercut by a holding cost. Swing traders are among the most commonly excluded groups on this roster, so a contractual permission is worth recording.

Bottom line

C+ Preliminary

Audacity Capital holds a preliminary C+ under our published methodology. The letter can move as verification of the record completes; the full dimension record and every source behind it are on this page. Code 14th takes 14% off the eligible challenge price at checkout.

14th Claim the offer

Spotted an error in this review? Write to corrections@propfirmgrade.com. We correct within 48h and log every change under Review history.